FIRE & Retirement Basics
How Much Should You Have Saved by 30, 40, 50? (And Why the Charts Can Mislead You)
6 min read ยท Updated August 2026
Quick answer: A widely cited benchmark suggests having 1x your salary saved by age 30, 3x by 40, 6x by 50, and 10x by 67 โ based on Fidelity's analysis assuming retirement at 67. These benchmarks may not apply if you're planning to retire earlier or later than that.
"How much should I have saved by now?" has to be one of the most repeated questions in personal finance, and one chart โ Fidelity's age-based salary multipliers โ gets cited constantly in answer. It's a genuinely useful starting compass. It's also easy to misread if you don't know what's baked into it.
The widely cited benchmark
| Age | Savings target (multiple of salary) |
|---|---|
| 30 | 1x |
| 40 | 3x |
| 50 | 6x |
| 60 | 8x |
| 67 | 10x |
For someone earning $80,000 at age 40, this suggests roughly $240,000 saved (3x) as a checkpoint. It's a widely used shorthand, built by Fidelity from analysis of what it takes to retire at 67 while keeping a similar lifestyle.
What's actually baked into that chart
The benchmark isn't a universal law โ it rests on a specific, stated set of assumptions:
- Retirement at 67 โ retiring earlier or later shifts every single number on the chart.
- Saving around 15% of income annually (employer match included) throughout your whole career.
- Social Security covering a meaningful share of retirement income, with savings covering the rest.
- No pension, plus continuous employment with steady wage growth โ a career with gaps, career changes, or an actual pension shifts the picture considerably.
If your plan looks different from these assumptions โ especially if you're aiming to retire well before 67, which is really the entire premise of FIRE โ the age-based multiples aren't measuring the same goal you're actually working toward.
Averages, medians, and why they mislead each other
When "average retirement savings by age" stats get compared against a chart like this one, it's worth checking whether the number is an average or a median. Average balances get pulled up substantially by a relatively small number of very high balances, while the median โ the actual middle value โ tends to sit a lot lower and usually represents where a typical saver really stands. Comparing yourself to an average instead of a median can paint a misleadingly discouraging picture. Occasionally the opposite, too.
A more personal alternative
Age-based snapshots are a quick gut check, not a plan โ they can't know your actual planned retirement age, your expected spending, or how long your retirement needs to last, all of which move the target substantially. Our retirement and FIRE calculator builds your target from those specifics instead of a generic age checkpoint: your own retirement age, your own monthly budget by category, and how many years that budget needs to last, projected against your actual current savings and contribution rate.
This article is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. Salary-multiplier benchmarks are general industry guidelines and may not reflect your specific circumstances.
Quick Answers
How much should I have saved by age 30?
A widely cited Fidelity benchmark suggests about 1 times your annual salary by age 30, though this assumes a traditional retirement age of 67 and roughly 15% savings rate throughout your career.
Are retirement savings benchmarks by age accurate for everyone?
Not necessarily. They assume a specific retirement age, savings rate, and reliance on Social Security, so they may not reflect your situation if you're planning to retire earlier or later, or have different circumstances.
Should I compare myself to average or median retirement savings?
Median is usually more representative. Average balances are often pulled up significantly by a small number of very high balances, which can make the typical saver's situation look more discouraging than it is by comparison.